PsiPog.net : Q&A Perception

# PsiPog.net

# Perception

353 questions in this category

< Back to Categories

Pages: First ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36

## Questions

SKainuiG asks on December 14, 2003, 10:58pm:

Is it possible to create a telepathic link from a mother to its baby if the baby is still inside it's mother's stomach, or even someone else linking to the baby for that matter.

Rainsong replies on December 15, 2003, 11:36pm:

If either the mother or baby has any telepathic aptitude at all, they almost certainly have a link already. As for the probable intent of your question, yes, telepathic communication with a child still in the womb is possible, both by the mother and by a third party.

pedro75657 asks on November 2, 2003, 12:30am:

Im veary sorry for bothering you with my trivial question, but i try to meditat often. a lot of the time when i meditat, sink deep within myself. After i start to trance i fell myself expand. after that i am bombarded with some off the wall thoughts that im not sure are my own. It makes it hard to concentrat sometimes. i was wandering am i intercepting other peoples thoughts, and would puting up a shild help me if i am intercepting others thoughts un intentionaly? i know i am a little sensitive, becase i am quite good at scaneing people, and i fell everyone around me. thank you for your time.

Rainsong replies on December 14, 2003, 6:20pm:

If you are picking up other people's thoughts, a well-constructed Shield programmed to keep such thoughts out should solve the problem. Your other option is not to go so deep into trance, in which state you are more likely to pick up such broadcasts.

fvig2001 asks on November 13, 2003, 8:47am:

I have a problem with telepathy, I am a natural empath and I can't seem to get any telepathic information and all I get is empathic information. Is there anyway to work around this problem?

Rainsong replies on December 14, 2003, 6:16pm:

Empathy is part of telepathy, but being an empath does not mean you necessarily have any natural talent for the other parts of the category. There are several ways around the problem. The easiest is to learn to Send and Receive thoughts as though starting completely from scratch (ie, like anyone else trying to learn it), _but_ include a busrt of empathic sending at the same time you send the thought.

1 of 1 person found this question helpful

triocalas_x asks on December 1, 2003, 3:49pm:

hehe I've asked a lot of questions:p One more.

Are there a lot of "natural" psychics in the overall human population, whether they are aware of it or not? Or is it this thing that very few people are born with?

Rainsong replies on December 14, 2003, 6:05pm:

The sort of folk originally meant by the very localised slang term that got shortened to "natural" are relatively uncommon. It appears that highly talented psychics are also uncommon, as are highly talented pianists. As to the actual percentage, that is unknowable at this point; there has been no study extensive enough to give a percentage of the human population. The apparent "stats" are variable from place to place, and there is considerable disagreement as to what constitutes "talented" and/or "natural".

theAlias asks on December 12, 2003, 1:20am:

Hi,

I hope this belongs here. Are drawings and other forms of visual art often heavily imprinted with thoughts/emotions? Hopefully, this is not a stupid question. Thanks for reading.

Alias

Rainsong replies on December 14, 2003, 5:53pm:

"Heavily"? No, not really. However, they do tend to carry _some_ imprinting of this sort.

liquid_fire asks on December 13, 2003, 6:02am:

i've been meaning to practice telepathy for some time now, but theres one problem.
all of the exersises on this site need two or more people to work, and most of the people i know don't believe, letalone are willing to practice this stuff, so is there anything i can do on my own to practice telepathy?

Rainsong replies on December 13, 2003, 8:12pm:

By definition, "telepathy" is communication between two or more minds. It cannot be done solo. However, there are preliminary exercises which can make later telepathic attempts easier. One of these is to read silently while forming the words as clearly as you can in your mind, so you "hear" them....exactly the opposite of what you would want to do if you intended to increase your reading speed. Another is to picture objects in your mind; practice visualization.

Strata asks on December 9, 2003, 5:55pm:

How difficult is it to Remote View Numbers? I ask for the experiences of other's who have tried. I find it even hard to recieve numbers by means of telepathy. Is there method that I can use to make my self sensitive to them?

~Strata

Rainsong replies on December 9, 2003, 10:02pm:

Numbers are not generally good targets for most of the methods used within RV protocols. Usually, they do not "come through" well.

Peebrain replies on December 12, 2003, 4:55am:

http://www.grillflame.com/lottery/project1/

Check that out ^

dj10coon asks on November 25, 2003, 7:59pm:

my sister doesnt believe in psi, but she has incredible empathy, should i train her?

Rainsong replies on December 10, 2003, 8:28pm:

If she claims not to believe in such things, she probably does not want you to teach her. However, to get the definitive answer, ask _her_.

Eldrad asks on December 9, 2003, 1:44pm:

Do you feel it dangerous to open up a long-term telepathic link with a friend or companion, using it to let you be aware of their current emotional status, or to locate them if need be, as long as you are careful what it is you send and recieve on that line?

Rainsong replies on December 10, 2003, 8:21pm:

Some kinds of deliberately established links are dangerous. If you have to ask this question, you don't know enough about the subject to be trying it.

Eldrad asks on December 3, 2003, 1:53pm:

Is it dangerous to maintain long term telepathic connections, with friends and family, etc, without their knowledge? Or would you deem it advisable? Surely, as long as you are careful with what you send and recieve, the only danger would be extreme emotional distress, as long as I haven't missed something.

Rainsong replies on December 10, 2003, 8:19pm:

Some linking with people to whom you have strong emotional ties appears to be normal. Deliberately established links tend to be more intense than the average incidental link.

Establishing such a link without the consent of the other party is pretty much a hostile act. Some people will notice the link. Whether it is dangerous depends on the nature of the link and whether the other person chooses to do something about it.

The very intense links which _are_ decidedly dangerous are not likely to go unnoticed by either party. "Extreme emotional distress" is not the extent of possible damage. Deterioration of the personalities of both parties is one of the possibilities, which has been recorded, and appears to be permanent and irreversible.

Pages: First ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36

< Back to Categories

All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2000-2006 PsiPog.net and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.

You must agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to view this website. Click here to contact the webmaster.