PsiPog.net : View topic - "Proto Energy"

# PsiPog.net

# View topic - "Proto Energy"

PsiPog.net Forum Index » PsiPog.net Ideas » "Proto Energy"

Goto page 1, 2 Next

"Proto Energy"

Poll: Is my idea a good one for the site?

Yes.

20%

[ 4 ]

No.

15%

[ 3 ]

It could be, but I can see what might go wrong...

65%

[ 13 ]

Other?

0%

[ 0 ]

Total Votes : 20

Author | Message
--- | ---
"Proto Energy" on Fri May 05, 2006 1:56 pm

### PouncingKavu

Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 57

Before I joined PSIPOG, I was a member of the website bzpower.com. If you look at the forums, you will see a bar that is partially filled in under the person's avatar, by the personal information.
A full bar looks like this:
A neutral bar looks like this:
An empty bar looks like this:
Moderators can increase or decrease a user's "proto energy," which here should be called "anti-fluffy-ness" or something, based on the user's actions. Obviously flaming, and major spam will decrease proto energy, but also leaking false information, having huge sigs, creating multiple accounts to vote on things will decrease proto energy. If you hit minus five energy (0 is neutral) then you automatically get suspended whlie mods review you to decide what happens next. On this site, doing things like lying about skills, providing false information about the location of lost objects (though this is hard to prove), invoking religion, etc, would warrant a decrease. Helping people out with information, techniques, and new theorires that make sense could boost your energy. What does having a low bar do other than push you closer to suspension? Well, nothing in reality, but I know from being a member there for a long time that those with low bars aren't believed as much, won't be helped as much, and you generally are less excited when a low bar person posts in your topic. This obviously has its downsides, but it is sure a good way to keep the site less fluffy. What do you think of this?

Back to top
Posted on Fri May 05, 2006 7:04 pm

### Apollo

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 1589

this is not a fairly bad idea. It is kind of like what PsiOnline does, no?

Back to top
Posted on Fri May 05, 2006 11:32 pm

### Rahmid

Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 739

That would work, but would have some bad problems. Say a person starts spewing off about dreams, complete full bar goes to nothing, But they are REALLY RELALY good at PK. They'd have no credibility cause they made mistakes on other sections. Maybe it could be broken up, have a PK bar, Dream bar, psi minipulation bar.
Other problem, I can see it easiy start a flame war, "thats fluff, just look at your bar."
But it sounds like it would be an quick and simple way to "disapline" ppl breaking the rules.
Rahmid

Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 11:12 am

### Apollo

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 1589

I think it should be a breaking the rules thing. So you can see how far away you are from getting yelled at by a mod or being in trouble.

Back to top
Posted on Sat May 06, 2006 11:43 pm

### mattz1010

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 885

Yeah, but for breaking rules, that's just the 'points' thing. Where you recieve warnings (that show to everyone whenever you post), and when you get to 3, admins/moderators decide what happens from there.
Although, if you want to use this stlylish (and it is) bar, for rule-breaking ONLY, get it to start at full. I think full would be worth either 5 or 3 points.
As the bar decreases...well, you know from there.

Back to top
Posted on Sun May 07, 2006 8:49 am

### Bob_stew

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 265

Could be fun.. Not necessary, but fun. A 'fluffiness' meter. Lol, I know someone who would certainly drop fast to the bottom.

Back to top
Posted on Sun May 07, 2006 10:06 am

### sgtpsion

Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 425

It would be a good idea for rule-breaking, but not for general fluffiness, simply because it's too hard to enforce (who's the judge of what's fluffy?), but we'd also be seeing lots of empty bars around here. And that would essentially defeat the purpose of the whole system.

Back to top
Posted on Sun May 07, 2006 12:15 pm

### Pricemac

Joined: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 90

I think its too strict, too much "The mods look at it and decide, the mods lower it, the mods raise it..." I think you should have a bar, that raises as you make good posts, but whats a good post? This implies there is a voting system, you should have the option, on every post, to rate it... 1-5 or something, and then, you lower if you make a stupid remark, or break the rules, and raise if you make a very valid point, good points for being intelligent, bad ones for being stupid or ignorant(aka Fluff).

Back to top
Posted on Sun May 07, 2006 12:16 pm

### psi_manipulator_3000

Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 1274

I agree that it would make some people seem as if they are lying when they are not, just becasue they have a low bar. Doesn't seem fair. The fluffiness wouldn't work, simply becasue, like sgtpsion said, whos the judge of what is fluffy and what is not?
Maybe we could all start at a low bar, and then get points for giving intelligent and constructive posts. Then people with very high bars can join in certain forums, like the staff one at the bottom of the index list, for example. It's sort of like a doggy treat system for being a good boy. (edit) or girl. lol. sorry.

Back to top
Posted on Sun May 07, 2006 12:58 pm

### Pricemac

Joined: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 90

Exactly, and, such a system could run pretty much autonomously with only a little supervision from a mod every now and then, which I think is much nicer for mods.

Back to top
Posted on Sun May 07, 2006 1:39 pm

### Apollo

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 1589

Pricemac wrote:
I think its too strict, too much "The mods look at it and decide, the mods lower it, the mods raise it..." I think you should have a bar, that raises as you make good posts, but whats a good post? This implies there is a voting system, you should have the option, on every post, to rate it... 1-5 or something, and then, you lower if you make a stupid remark, or break the rules, and raise if you make a very valid point, good points for being intelligent, bad ones for being stupid or ignorant(aka Fluff).

The only problem with that is if a group of people dont like the idea and vote negatively but the people who like it dont vote.

Back to top
Posted on Mon May 08, 2006 9:59 am

### somefatguy

Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 1187

I don't like it.
1. Discrimination would occur according to bar.
2. Too much work for mods.
It's just way too much work for someone to say: "Oh, that's fluff" or "Oh, that's good." It's not like you could get a program to do it.

Back to top
Posted on Tue May 09, 2006 1:36 pm

### PouncingKavu

Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 57

somefatguy wrote:
Discrimination would occur according to bar.

Yes, that's the main problem. So maybe it wouldn't go into negative, then.

Back to top
Hmm... on Wed May 17, 2006 7:15 am

### Psyche15000

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 46

Good suggestion, but I like PsiPogs forums without the bar idea. It sounds cool and all, but if people want to go around lying, then they should take it away from PsiPog and somewhere else, but it's unlikely because alot of people out there really get a kick out of lying for some reason.

Back to top
Posted on Fri May 19, 2006 4:49 pm

### UltimateBlob

Joined: 16 May 2006
Posts: 172

PsiPog is a relitively fluffless forum, a 'fluff' bar might just cause people to get upset.

Back to top

Goto page 1, 2 Next

PsiPog.net Forum Index » PsiPog.net Ideas » "Proto Energy"

All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2000-2006 PsiPog.net and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.

You must agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to view this website. Click here to contact the webmaster.