A Little Weird » Forums » Do you sometimes feel that you can tell what a person is like even when not in person?

A Little Weird

reality bizarres the standard

You are not logged in - Join for Free - Login Forum Home » Weird Discussions » Do you sometimes feel that you can tell what a person is like even when not in person?

Page: 1, 2, 3 - Next

Do you sometimes feel that you can tell what a person is like even when not in person?

Author | Message
--- | ---

Wandering Wolf

I sometimes find that I can get psychic impressions of what people are like even over the internet. The only problem I am having is distinguishing between whether or not these are actual psychic impressions or just my interpretation of the tone used in their words.
Despite this confusion, there was a case in which I was convinced that I was receiving a genuine psychic impression of someone back in the day of psipog.
He was a moderator who seemed to have great composure, maturity, and refined online manners, but I always felt something sinister and fake about this superficial impression.
As it turns out, he was actually a very rude and contemptuous person hiding behind this facade of benevolence and proper behavior.
Inversely, there was someone else who exuded this superficial personality, but I did not feel anything contradicting lying behind it. They both appeared similar on the surface, but only one of them was being his true self.
I do not wish to disclose the identities of these two persons for their sake and my own sake, so please don't try to guess or squeeze it out of me.
Has anyone else experienced this phenomenon? Any thoughts and theories?
I realize that I am going to receive a lot of skepticism. *sigh* At least skepticism is usually a denotation of higher intelligence and consideration. That's one of the things that I like about this website: Most of us are self-righteous bastards who can actually think for ourselves and disagree with each other XD.
NOTE: When I say "Do you sometimes feel that you can tell what a person is like..." I am referring to a person's outward personality that you would notice in person or even over the phone (i.e. outgoing, quiet, serious, mean, kind, laid back, rude, polite, etc.).
I sometimes find that I can get psychic impressions of what people are like even over the internet. The only problem I am having is distinguishing between whether or not these are actual psychic impressions or just my interpretation of the tone used in their words. Despite this confusion, there was a case in which I was convinced that I was receiving a genuine psychic impression of someone back in the day of psipog. He was a moderator who seemed to have great composure, maturity, and refined online manners, but I always felt something sinister and fake about this superficial impression. As it turns out, he was actually a very rude and contemptuous person hiding behind this facade of benevolence and proper behavior. Inversely, there was someone else who exuded this superficial personality, but I did not feel anything contradicting lying behind it. They both appeared similar on the surface, but only one of them was being his true self. I do not wish to disclose the identities of these two persons for their sake and my own sake, so please don't try to guess or squeeze it out of me. Has anyone else experienced this phenomenon? Any thoughts and theories? I realize that I am going to receive a lot of skepticism. *sigh* At least skepticism is usually a denotation of higher intelligence and consideration. That's one of the things that I like about this website: Most of us are self-righteous bastards who can actually think for ourselves and disagree with each other XD. NOTE: When I say "Do you sometimes feel that you can tell what a person is like..." I am referring to a person's outward personality that you would notice in person or even over the phone (i.e. outgoing, quiet, serious, mean, kind, laid back, rude, polite, etc.).

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

RazSh18

Hey Wandering Wolf , I have that ability too , so don't feel alone :D
It started a year ago from no-where. I think it's some kind of empathy
( Share of emotions bewteen two friend / people who have somthing in common )
So, Yes I've expirienced it ( but its getting wicker - probably beacuse I stoppped using it for prediction )
Enjoy it ;)
Hey Wandering Wolf , I have that ability too , so don't feel alone :D It started a year ago from no-where. I think it's some kind of empathy ( Share of emotions bewteen two friend / people who have somthing in common ) So, Yes I've expirienced it ( but its getting wicker - probably beacuse I stoppped using it for prediction ) Enjoy it ;)

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Wandering Wolf

Empathy, huh? That makes sense, but I can't say that I feel something in common with the people I read online.
Thank you for the reply. I am glad to see that I am not alone afterall.
Empathy, huh? That makes sense, but I can't say that I feel something in common with the people I read online. Thank you for the reply. I am glad to see that I am not alone afterall.

Last edited by Wandering Wolf, 4 years, 7 months ago
Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Dash

Hey! I can do that too!
But.. sometimes i need a picture to be 100%
I've been right about the ones ive talked to.. never really found out about some.. i always stay away from the ones i think are jerks
Hey! I can do that too! But.. sometimes i need a picture to be 100% I've been right about the ones ive talked to.. never really found out about some.. i always stay away from the ones i think are jerks

Last edited by Dash, 4 years, 7 months ago
Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

RazSh18

you ( and I ) Don't the other side talking, we can feel how the subject reacted before he even thought of writing back at us. Am I right?
you ( and I ) Don't the other side talking, we can feel how the subject reacted before he even thought of writing back at us. Am I right?

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Wandering Wolf

@Dash
Dash:
Hey! I can do that too!
But.. sometimes i need a picture to be 100%
Interesting, although, I'd have to say that photographs can only enhance our impressions because of the obvious qualities that they reveal about people, such as the symbolism behind their genuine or fake facial expressions. We must never confuse critical visual analysis with psychic reception. Otherwise we will delude ourselves to no end.
For me, personally, looking at a photograph is like cheating because a picture is truly worth a thousand words and not all of those words are pleasant.
@RazSh18
RazSh18: you ( and I ) Don't the other side talking, we can feel how the subject reacted before he even thought of writing back at us. Am I right?
Are you talking to or about me? Am I the "subject" or are you addressing this to me directly asking me my own opinion about the "subject"?
Also, I'd like to add something that I forgot to mention earlier. I agree that this could be some form of empathy, but I find it strange because I've never considered myself to be empathic. Ironically, I am a rather emotionless person, so I should technically be a perfect candidate for reading people's emotions, yet I doubt that I really have read other people's emotions. Whether or not it IS empathy has yet to be determined. As far as I am concerned, one may be able simply sense a person's personality through simple psychic reception or may be able to deduce what a person's overall superficial personality is composed of via the analysis of the results of distant empathy.
If this is the case, then I'd have to say that you, RazSh18, are using empathy, while I, am using simple psychic reception. If I am using empathy, this would mean that I am just not aware enough of it to notice that it is subtle distant empathy.
@Dash [quote] Dash: Hey! I can do that too! But.. sometimes i need a picture to be 100% [/quote] Interesting, although, I'd have to say that photographs can only enhance our impressions because of the obvious qualities that they reveal about people, such as the symbolism behind their genuine or fake facial expressions. We must never confuse critical visual analysis with psychic reception. Otherwise we will delude ourselves to no end. For me, personally, looking at a photograph is like cheating because a picture is truly worth a thousand words and not all of those words are pleasant. @RazSh18 [quote] RazSh18: you ( and I ) Don't the other side talking, we can feel how the subject reacted before he even thought of writing back at us. Am I right? [/quote] Are you talking to or about me? Am I the "subject" or are you addressing this to me directly asking me my own opinion about the "subject"? Also, I'd like to add something that I forgot to mention earlier. I agree that this could be some form of empathy, but I find it strange because I've never considered myself to be empathic. Ironically, I am a rather emotionless person, so I should technically be a perfect candidate for reading people's emotions, yet I doubt that I really have read other people's emotions. Whether or not it IS empathy has yet to be determined. As far as I am concerned, one may be able simply sense a person's personality through simple psychic reception or may be able to deduce what a person's overall superficial personality is composed of via the analysis of the results of distant empathy. If this is the case, then I'd have to say that you, RazSh18, are using empathy, while I, am using simple psychic reception. If I am using empathy, this would mean that I am just not aware enough of it to notice that it is subtle distant empathy.

Last edited by Wandering Wolf, 4 years, 7 months ago
Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Akio

I can Ussually tell what a persons personality is automatically, and, I've noticed that every facial feature they have is like a reflection of that personality. It's weird, if you've ever noticed that before...
I can Ussually tell what a persons personality is automatically, and, I've noticed that every facial feature they have is like a reflection of that personality. It's weird, if you've ever noticed that before...

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Dash

"We must never confuse critical visual analysis with psychic reception. Otherwise we will delude ourselves to no end."
you trying to say something... buddy?
i used pictures before only to home in on people i've never met before.. by any means.. in person, online.. anything
and i've never been critical to anyone because of their appearance, only when im sure their a dirt ball on the inside
like for example..
you talk like a genius and you have wise input..
but you just cut me and Razsh18 down and put yourself on a pedestal,
for stuff you assumed no less
"We must never confuse critical visual analysis with psychic reception. Otherwise we will delude ourselves to no end." you trying to say something... buddy? i used pictures before only to home in on people i've never met before.. by any means.. in person, online.. anything and i've never been critical to anyone because of their appearance, only when im sure their a dirt ball on the inside like for example.. you talk like a genius and you have wise input.. but you just cut me and Razsh18 down and put yourself on a pedestal, for stuff you assumed no less

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Akio

I've noticed that different features of a person can be used to determine many different things, the persons personality, their job, whether they're a righty or a lefty, whether their lying or not when they speak to you, if you have a good enough memory you can even figure out how people's names, adresses, and personal information at a glance, It's simple observations, something that both mine and Wandering Wolf's Beliefs are based on.
(If I'm incorrect on the last part wandering wolf, please correct me if I am wrong)
Psychic Reception is different from Empathy, vastly. The main difference is that Psychic reception has a much shorter range and doesn't just encompass reading emotions, but also thoughts and sometimes people with simple reception can really detect the psysical aspects of other people, like pain, for instance. Whereas Empathy Has a Huge range and is very clear, mainly because it only deals specifically with sensing emotions.
Someone's picture or face in genneral is able to reveal people's greater personality. It's a Science, a complicated one, but still, at that.
Psychic Reception as a whole can dectect subtle emotions only at a small radius, and can only sense very, very powerful emotions over a large distance.
Simply put, Empathy isn't effected by distance, Psychic reception, however, is.
I would recommend, to all of you, to learn both and then Look at the differences yourself.
I've noticed that different features of a person can be used to determine many different things, the persons personality, their job, whether they're a righty or a lefty, whether their lying or not when they speak to you, if you have a good enough memory you can even figure out how people's names, adresses, and personal information at a glance, It's simple observations, something that both mine and Wandering Wolf's Beliefs are based on. (If I'm incorrect on the last part wandering wolf, please correct me if I am wrong) Psychic Reception is different from Empathy, vastly. The main difference is that Psychic reception has a much shorter range and doesn't just encompass reading emotions, but also thoughts and sometimes people with simple reception can really detect the psysical aspects of other people, like pain, for instance. Whereas Empathy Has a Huge range and is very clear, mainly because it only deals specifically with sensing emotions. Someone's picture or face in genneral is able to reveal people's greater personality. It's a Science, a complicated one, but still, at that. Psychic Reception as a whole can dectect subtle emotions only at a small radius, and can only sense very, very powerful emotions over a large distance. Simply put, Empathy isn't effected by distance, Psychic reception, however, is. I would recommend, to all of you, to learn both and then Look at the differences yourself.

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Wandering Wolf

@Akio
Akio, I will respond to your post on this thread as well as your post on the "weird experiences" thread later on today (I am going to be occupied for a while), but first I am obligated to respond to Dash's post to clear up this unfortunate misunderstanding between him and I.
@Dash
you talk like a genius and you have wise input..
A genius I am not. I don't pretend to be one either. I'm just naturally articulate. It's all about the way I was raised. I cannot help it. I'm sorry if it seems like an act to you. As for feeling that my own input is wise, I can only say that you are again mistaken. I often worry that I am going to sound stupid and foolish when I post here because I am surrounded by so many intellectuals with so much psychic and psionic experience, while I, have very little experience and limited knowledge on the subjects. I often just theorize and come up with new ideas, so I take a risk everytime I do so. I usually get quite surprised when people agree with what I have to say. It is not my place to deem whether or not my input is wise, that is for others to determine.
but you just cut me and Razsh18 down
First of all, how did I cut RazSh18 down? Can you explain please? As for "cutting [you] down", that was not the intention. All I was doing was expressing my own claim. You can debate it with me if you'd like.
and put yourself on a pedestal, for stuff you assumed no less
When I read the part about putting myself on a pedastal, I almost laughed. It was funny because I never felt like I was doing anything like that. It wouldn't be the first time someone got a strange impression that I was some kind of arrogant jerk. It really hurts my feelings when people make assumptions like that because I know, for a fact, that those same people would take back what they said if they were to meet me in person. I hate and stay away from arrogant people, so it is one of the greatest insults a person can bestow upon me to assume that I am arrogant without even meeting me in person.
Secondly, the only thing I ASSUMED was that it could be distant empathy or distant psychic reception. If you think that I assumed that photographs are not useful in picking up psychic impressions, you are mistaken. I was not assuming that, I was ASSERTING that because I had analyzed it many times and come to a logical conclusion.
However, at some point during the creation of this very post, I realized that viewing a photograph could trigger an elucidating psychic response. In other words, I will concede that you could have a point. I'm just saying that we need to be careful not to confuse psychic insight with plain visual observation.
One last thing: I have a feeling that you are still going to respond negatively to this, thinking that I am lecturing you from my "pedestal".
This once happened with an online friend of mine. She thought that, when I "corrected" her, that I was doing so condenscendingly. I had to apologize to her in a variety of ways while explaining that that was simply not the case.
When I "correct" people, I "correct" them to help them out, not to embarrass and/or insult them, so please try to understand where I am coming from. If people that I unintentionally offend online could at least hear my grim and somewhat monotonous voice they would understand that I am not speaking to them condescendingly.
Sadly, we do not have that luxury, so I can only hope that others will not misinterpret my intentions.
@Akio Akio, I will respond to your post on this thread as well as your post on the "weird experiences" thread later on today (I am going to be occupied for a while), but first I am obligated to respond to Dash's post to clear up this unfortunate misunderstanding between him and I. @Dash [quote] you talk like a genius and you have wise input.. [/quote] A genius I am not. I don't pretend to be one either. I'm just naturally articulate. It's all about the way I was raised. I cannot help it. I'm sorry if it seems like an act to you. As for feeling that my own input is wise, I can only say that you are again mistaken. I often worry that I am going to sound stupid and foolish when I post here because I am surrounded by so many intellectuals with so much psychic and psionic experience, while I, have very little experience and limited knowledge on the subjects. I often just theorize and come up with new ideas, so I take a risk everytime I do so. I usually get quite surprised when people agree with what I have to say. It is not my place to deem whether or not my input is wise, that is for others to determine. [quote] but you just cut me and Razsh18 down [/quote] First of all, how did I cut RazSh18 down? Can you explain please? As for "cutting [you] down", that was not the intention. All I was doing was expressing my own claim. You can debate it with me if you'd like. [quote] and put yourself on a pedestal, for stuff you assumed no less [/quote] When I read the part about putting myself on a pedastal, I almost laughed. It was funny because I never felt like I was doing anything like that. It wouldn't be the first time someone got a strange impression that I was some kind of arrogant jerk. It really hurts my feelings when people make assumptions like that because I know, for a fact, that those same people would take back what they said if they were to meet me in person. I hate and stay away from arrogant people, so it is one of the greatest insults a person can bestow upon me to assume that I am arrogant without even meeting me in person. Secondly, the only thing I ASSUMED was that it could be distant empathy or distant psychic reception. If you think that I assumed that photographs are not useful in picking up psychic impressions, you are mistaken. I was not assuming that, I was ASSERTING that because I had analyzed it many times and come to a logical conclusion. However, at some point during the creation of this very post, I realized that viewing a photograph could trigger an elucidating psychic response. In other words, I will concede that you could have a point. I'm just saying that we need to be careful not to confuse psychic insight with plain visual observation. One last thing: I have a feeling that you are still going to respond negatively to this, thinking that I am lecturing you from my "pedestal". This once happened with an online friend of mine. She thought that, when I "corrected" her, that I was doing so condenscendingly. I had to apologize to her in a variety of ways while explaining that that was simply not the case. When I "correct" people, I "correct" them to help them out, not to embarrass and/or insult them, so please try to understand where I am coming from. If people that I unintentionally offend online could at least hear my grim and somewhat monotonous voice they would understand that I am not speaking to them condescendingly. Sadly, we do not have that luxury, so I can only hope that others will not misinterpret my intentions.

Last edited by Wandering Wolf, 4 years, 7 months ago
Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Dash

i didn't say you were arrogant, i was trying to say you were bolstering your ego,
and i thought by saying things about "critical visual analysis" and "deluding ourselves to no end", you were implying (or assuming) i was a stuck up deluded snob.. seeing as how the conversation was directed at me,
and then you said: "For me, personally, looking at a photograph is like cheating"
which added with the other thing, is kind of like saying, "im better"
and it seemed like you were making fun of razsh for his grammar,
i mean.. i know what he's saying, it kinda seemed like you didnt even try to understand,
i know that you probably didnt mean to, and im sorry i jumped on it
i didn't say you were arrogant, i was trying to say you were bolstering your ego, and i thought by saying things about "critical visual analysis" and "deluding ourselves to no end", you were implying (or assuming) i was a stuck up deluded snob.. seeing as how the conversation was directed at me, and then you said: "For me, personally, looking at a photograph is like cheating" which added with the other thing, is kind of like saying, "im better" and it seemed like you were making fun of razsh for his grammar, i mean.. i know what he's saying, it kinda seemed like you didnt even try to understand, i know that you probably didnt mean to, and im sorry i jumped on it

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Anonymous Dark

Mmm, not necessarily. I usually feel like I have a person all figured out when I meet them, and then I'm surprised to see that they're actually pretty different from what I expected. :-D
Mmm, not necessarily. I usually feel like I have a person all figured out when I meet them, and then I'm surprised to see that they're actually pretty different from what I expected. :-D

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Akio

SOme parts of the personality mask others ^_^, It's all about not judging someone untill you know who they are in reality. I have a Friend who Used to do that, and the same thing ended up happenning. It's interesting trying to figure people out though.
SOme parts of the personality mask others ^_^, It's all about not judging someone untill you know who they are in reality. I have a Friend who Used to do that, and the same thing ended up happenning. It's interesting trying to figure people out though.

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Wandering Wolf

@Dash
i didn't say you were arrogant, i was trying to say you were bolstering your ego,
That would go against one of the main teachings of Buddhism. I try to deflate my ego and keep it in check as much as possible. If I sound like I am trying to bolster my ego, then it is simply a misunderstanding/misinterpretation. Whether or not you want to believe me is up to you.
and i thought by saying things about "critical visual analysis" and "deluding ourselves to no end", you were implying (or assuming) i was a stuck up deluded snob.. seeing as how the conversation was directed at me,
No, no, no. I was just warning everyone that it is easy for us to confuse two totally different phenomena that only share superficial similarities. I was speaking from experience and the mistakes I made in similar matters. I understand how you could see how I directed it at you; for that I apologize.
and then you said: "For me, personally, looking at a photograph is like cheating"
which added with the other thing, is kind of like saying, "im better"
Yes, I see how it can look that way. I made that comment to strengthen my argument, but I did not expect you (or anyone else for that matter) to interpret it that way. I've made the mistake of using photographs to bias my opinions on people, so I am really no different or "better" than anyone else.
Anyway, I still concede that photographs can trigger psychic insight in some cases. I had completely forgotten my strange experience where I looked at a photograph of someone and was eventually overcome with a very strong and strange feeling that had an ambiguous meaning. It was some kind of realization. I'd rather not go into the details though, as it is very personal and embarrassing for me to discuss.
and it seemed like you were making fun of razsh for his grammar,
i mean.. i know what he's saying, it kinda seemed like you didnt even try to understand,
*LOL* That last part makes me feel very stupid because I actually pondered the meaning for several minutes before asking him what he meant!
Anyway, I understand that he is from a foreign country and that it must be very difficult to express himself on these forums, but I simply could not fully grasp the meaning. It seemed ambiguous to me because I didn't know who he was referring to specifically. I didn't mean to offend him.
Could you perhaps explain it to me then?
Dash, I hope this explanation satisfies you because I'm running out of energy to type so much. I will probably have other people to reply to for at least a day or two.
I have not come here to make enemies and I'd rather get along with everyone, and that includes you too. I don't have a problem with you. You seem like a reasonable person with good intentions to me, so I'd rather avoid conflict with you especially.
Perhaps I should lighten the mood a little. Here are some hilarious YouTube videos that should give you a good laugh or two if you haven't seen them:
(I can't believe I forgot that there are some young members here. Sorry about that. Here is the disclaimer:)
DISCLAIMER:
THE FOLLOWING LINKS LEAD TO VIDEOS THAT CONTAIN SEXUALLY AND VERBALLY EXPLICIT CONTENT. UPON READING THIS, YOU HEREBY AGREE NOT TO HOLD WANDERING WOLF RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ACTUAL AND/OR PERCEIVED EMOTIONAL/MENTAL/PHYSICAL DAMAGE INCURRED AS A DIRECT OR INDIRECT RESULT OF WATCHING ONE OR MORE OF THESE VIDEOS.
1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRuNxHqwazs
2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nivR8LkSn1Q
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-3qncy5Qfk
EDIT:
Wait a minute...I think, after reading RazSh18's comment again, it seems like he was referring to me because it wouldn't have made much sense for him to be speaking to you, Dash.
In that case, RazSh18, I'm sorry for not figuring it out earlier and I can only say that I sometimes do know how people are going to respond, but I am usually wrong since we can all act upredictable at times. Dash's responses, for example, were not nearly what I would have expected from him. Some psychic I am :(.
I can be so thick at times. I should have used my common sense. I complicate the simplest things and turn them into equations with multiple variables and two or more possible answers.
@Dash [quote] i didn't say you were arrogant, i was trying to say you were bolstering your ego, [/quote] That would go against one of the main teachings of Buddhism. I try to deflate my ego and keep it in check as much as possible. If I sound like I am trying to bolster my ego, then it is simply a misunderstanding/misinterpretation. Whether or not you want to believe me is up to you. [quote] and i thought by saying things about "critical visual analysis" and "deluding ourselves to no end", you were implying (or assuming) i was a stuck up deluded snob.. seeing as how the conversation was directed at me, [/quote] No, no, no. I was just warning everyone that it is easy for us to confuse two totally different phenomena that only share superficial similarities. I was speaking from experience and the mistakes I made in similar matters. I understand how you could see how I directed it at you; for that I apologize. [quote] and then you said: "For me, personally, looking at a photograph is like cheating" which added with the other thing, is kind of like saying, "im better" [/quote] Yes, I see how it can look that way. I made that comment to strengthen my argument, but I did not expect you (or anyone else for that matter) to interpret it that way. I've made the mistake of using photographs to bias my opinions on people, so I am really no different or "better" than anyone else. Anyway, I still concede that photographs can trigger psychic insight in some cases. I had completely forgotten my strange experience where I looked at a photograph of someone and was eventually overcome with a very strong and strange feeling that had an ambiguous meaning. It was some kind of realization. I'd rather not go into the details though, as it is very personal and embarrassing for me to discuss. [quote] and it seemed like you were making fun of razsh for his grammar, i mean.. i know what he's saying, it kinda seemed like you didnt even try to understand, [/quote] *LOL* That last part makes me feel very stupid because I actually pondered the meaning for several minutes before asking him what he meant! Anyway, I understand that he is from a foreign country and that it must be very difficult to express himself on these forums, but I simply could not fully grasp the meaning. It seemed ambiguous to me because I didn't know who he was referring to specifically. I didn't mean to offend him. Could you perhaps explain it to me then? Dash, I hope this explanation satisfies you because I'm running out of energy to type so much. I will probably have other people to reply to for at least a day or two. I have not come here to make enemies and I'd rather get along with everyone, and that includes you too. I don't have a problem with you. You seem like a reasonable person with good intentions to me, so I'd rather avoid conflict with you especially. Perhaps I should lighten the mood a little. Here are some hilarious YouTube videos that should give you a good laugh or two if you haven't seen them: (I can't believe I forgot that there are some young members here. Sorry about that. Here is the disclaimer:) DISCLAIMER: THE FOLLOWING LINKS LEAD TO VIDEOS THAT CONTAIN SEXUALLY AND VERBALLY EXPLICIT CONTENT. UPON READING THIS, YOU HEREBY AGREE NOT TO HOLD WANDERING WOLF RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ACTUAL AND/OR PERCEIVED EMOTIONAL/MENTAL/PHYSICAL DAMAGE INCURRED AS A DIRECT OR INDIRECT RESULT OF WATCHING ONE OR MORE OF THESE VIDEOS. 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRuNxHqwazs 2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nivR8LkSn1Q 3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-3qncy5Qfk EDIT: Wait a minute...I think, after reading RazSh18's comment again, it seems like he was referring to me because it wouldn't have made much sense for him to be speaking to you, Dash. In that case, RazSh18, I'm sorry for not figuring it out earlier and I can only say that I sometimes do know how people are going to respond, but I am usually wrong since we can all act upredictable at times. Dash's responses, for example, were not nearly what I would have expected from him. Some psychic I am :(. I can be so thick at times. I should have used my common sense. I complicate the simplest things and turn them into equations with multiple variables and two or more possible answers.

Last edited by Wandering Wolf, 4 years, 7 months ago
Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Akio

you're a very kind person it seems to me, Wandering Wolf. If nothing else you try to observe what's going on around you, and I can respect you for that.
I hope I didn't misunderstand your beliefs in any way ^_^, I was kind of outspoken at that moment and I'm really not sure If I was correct.
If you could explain it sometime, I will deffinitely be grateful.
you're a very kind person it seems to me, Wandering Wolf. If nothing else you try to observe what's going on around you, and I can respect you for that. I hope I didn't misunderstand your beliefs in any way ^_^, I was kind of outspoken at that moment and I'm really not sure If I was correct. If you could explain it sometime, I will deffinitely be grateful.

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Dash

dont be hard on yourself wolfie,
when god gives you lemons, find a new god lol
i was an over defensive dickhead an i'm sorry,
(... but seriously... that lemons thing is my new catch phrase..)
dont be hard on yourself wolfie, when god gives you lemons, find a new god lol i was an over defensive dickhead an i'm sorry, (... but seriously... that lemons thing is my new catch phrase..)

Last edited by Dash, 4 years, 7 months ago
Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Akio

lol... Lemons...
lol... Lemons...

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Wandering Wolf

@Anonymous Dark
Mmm, not necessarily. I usually feel like I have a person all figured out when I meet them, and then I'm surprised to see that they're actually pretty different from what I expected. :-D
So true. I've learned that the hard way myself, as many of us have (^_^). Unless we are quite skilled and/or gifted, our first impressions are so misleading that we're better off keeping our mouths shut and waiting to see them show their true colors, assuming that they do so eventually. This is one of the reasons why I don't talk much in public. Too bad that silence can speak volumes XD.
@Akio
Okay, here is the reply I promised you for this thread:
I've noticed that different features of a person can be used to determine many different things, the persons personality, their job, whether they're a righty or a lefty, whether their lying or not when they speak to you, if you have a good enough memory you can even figure out how people's names, adresses, and personal information at a glance, It's simple observations, something that both mine and Wandering Wolf's Beliefs are based on.
(If I'm incorrect on the last part wandering wolf, please correct me if I am wrong)
When you mention that it is what our beliefs are based on, it reminds me of one of my mottos: Science before psionics. You sound like you have definitely made it into a respectable science of its own. I very much doubt that I am as skilled as you in that area. I can only deduce so much from my observations.
I can often derive multiple assumptions based on what people wear, drive, listen to, etc. Who people associate with, what their hobbies are, and how they express themselves can also be very useful in gathering potentially valid data about people. The problem is that these superficial qualities can mislead us as if they are all part of a large smokescreen used to cover up the truth that dances before our eyes. I've learned this lesson both while observing from a safe distance and while being severely embarrassed by the discovery.
Psychic Reception is different from Empathy, vastly. The main difference is that Psychic reception has a much shorter range
This makes me uncertain as to whether or not we are on the same page, Akio: I have never heard of psychic reception being limited to any kind of distance/radius before. Could you perhaps be referring to some other kind of pschyic reception? When I think of psychic reception, I think of clairvoyance, clairaudience, psychic intuition, and psychic feeling. These are the four psychic senses listed and described in Pete A. Sanders' book "You Are Psychic!"
I am convinced that I have had at least one involuntary experience with each of these psychic senses. I consider them all to be unique conduits for information and stimuli through which our actions can be guided.
Please give me your thoughts on this and tell me if you believe/know that these forms of psychic reception are also limited by distance. If so, I would be interested to read an example or two if you have any.
Someone's picture or face in genneral is able to reveal people's greater personality. It's a Science, a complicated one, but still, at that.
I agree. You sound like you've actually studied it. Is this true or is this highly complex science truly only embedded in our subconscious through which it is conveyed/linked to our visual cognition?
I would recommend, to all of you, to learn both and then Look at the differences yourself.
The quoted text above convinces me that you have had a lot of experience with this and/or have a lot of reliable sources to back it up. I look forward to your response.
@Anonymous Dark [quote] Mmm, not necessarily. I usually feel like I have a person all figured out when I meet them, and then I'm surprised to see that they're actually pretty different from what I expected. :-D [/quote] So true. I've learned that the hard way myself, as many of us have (^_^). Unless we are quite skilled and/or gifted, our first impressions are so misleading that we're better off keeping our mouths shut and waiting to see them show their true colors, assuming that they do so eventually. This is one of the reasons why I don't talk much in public. Too bad that silence can speak volumes XD. @Akio Okay, here is the reply I promised you for this thread: [quote] I've noticed that different features of a person can be used to determine many different things, the persons personality, their job, whether they're a righty or a lefty, whether their lying or not when they speak to you, if you have a good enough memory you can even figure out how people's names, adresses, and personal information at a glance, It's simple observations, something that both mine and Wandering Wolf's Beliefs are based on. (If I'm incorrect on the last part wandering wolf, please correct me if I am wrong) [/quote] When you mention that it is what our beliefs are based on, it reminds me of one of my mottos: Science before psionics. You sound like you have definitely made it into a respectable science of its own. I very much doubt that I am as skilled as you in that area. I can only deduce so much from my observations. I can often derive multiple assumptions based on what people wear, drive, listen to, etc. Who people associate with, what their hobbies are, and how they express themselves can also be very useful in gathering potentially valid data about people. The problem is that these superficial qualities can mislead us as if they are all part of a large smokescreen used to cover up the truth that dances before our eyes. I've learned this lesson both while observing from a safe distance and while being severely embarrassed by the discovery. [quote] Psychic Reception is different from Empathy, vastly. The main difference is that Psychic reception has a much shorter range [/quote] This makes me uncertain as to whether or not we are on the same page, Akio: I have never heard of psychic reception being limited to any kind of distance/radius before. Could you perhaps be referring to some other kind of pschyic reception? When I think of psychic reception, I think of clairvoyance, clairaudience, psychic intuition, and psychic feeling. These are the four psychic senses listed and described in Pete A. Sanders' book "You Are Psychic!" I am convinced that I have had at least one involuntary experience with each of these psychic senses. I consider them all to be unique conduits for information and stimuli through which our actions can be guided. Please give me your thoughts on this and tell me if you believe/know that these forms of psychic reception are also limited by distance. If so, I would be interested to read an example or two if you have any. [quote] Someone's picture or face in genneral is able to reveal people's greater personality. It's a Science, a complicated one, but still, at that. [/quote] I agree. You sound like you've actually studied it. Is this true or is this highly complex science truly only embedded in our subconscious through which it is conveyed/linked to our visual cognition? [quote] I would recommend, to all of you, to learn both and then Look at the differences yourself. [/quote] The quoted text above convinces me that you have had a lot of experience with this and/or have a lot of reliable sources to back it up. I look forward to your response.

Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Wandering Wolf

Heh heh, I spent so long on the above post that I didn't notice that you two were already responding. I'll have this post edited within a few minutes to respond to the two of you.
EDIT:
Damn. I'm such a slow typer/thinker. It took me longer than I thought.
@Akio
Gee, you almost made me blush with all of that. I've never received such a deep compliment before. Thank you. I've noticed that a lot of people here can be quite responsive and observant like Dash and yourself. I am pleased and honored to be part of such a community.
I hope I didn't misunderstand your beliefs in any way ^_^, I was kind of outspoken at that moment and I'm really not sure If I was correct.
Well, I hope my recent post will answer that for you. If you need a little more clarification, just let me know.
@Dash
dont be hard on yourself wolfie,
when god gives you lemons, find a new god lol
Was it funny enough for you? I sure hope so. It doesn't get much funnier than that if you ask me. I think I have made this previous conflict between us into lemonade. I've won your approval and understanding. That is reward enough.
I'm glad that this conflict is finally resolved. I accept your apology and I hope you can accept mine too. I still feel at fault for not being more careful, but I guess we are both too hard on ourselves. I like that nickname you've got for me: "wolfie". You can refer to me as that if you wish.
(... but seriously... that lemons thing is my new catch phrase..)
It was classic to say the least.
Anyway, I need to respond to Akio's post on the other thread. I'll still respond to your posts here as well though. It has been pleasure getting to know both of you.
Until next time,
WW (Too bad the abbreviation for my username could be confused with the abbreviation for Wonder Woman XD!)
Heh heh, I spent so long on the above post that I didn't notice that you two were already responding. I'll have this post edited within a few minutes to respond to the two of you. EDIT: Damn. I'm such a slow typer/thinker. It took me longer than I thought. @Akio Gee, you almost made me blush with all of that. I've never received such a deep compliment before. Thank you. I've noticed that a lot of people here can be quite responsive and observant like Dash and yourself. I am pleased and honored to be part of such a community. [quote] I hope I didn't misunderstand your beliefs in any way ^_^, I was kind of outspoken at that moment and I'm really not sure If I was correct. [/quote] Well, I hope my recent post will answer that for you. If you need a little more clarification, just let me know. @Dash [quote] dont be hard on yourself wolfie, when god gives you lemons, find a new god lol [/quote] Was it funny enough for you? I sure hope so. It doesn't get much funnier than that if you ask me. I think I have made this previous conflict between us into lemonade. I've won your approval and understanding. That is reward enough. I'm glad that this conflict is finally resolved. I accept your apology and I hope you can accept mine too. I still feel at fault for not being more careful, but I guess we are both too hard on ourselves. I like that nickname you've got for me: "wolfie". You can refer to me as that if you wish. [quote] (... but seriously... that lemons thing is my new catch phrase..) [/quote] It was classic to say the least. Anyway, I need to respond to Akio's post on the other thread. I'll still respond to your posts here as well though. It has been pleasure getting to know both of you. Until next time, WW (Too bad the abbreviation for my username could be confused with the abbreviation for Wonder Woman XD!)

Last edited by Wandering Wolf, 4 years, 7 months ago
Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Akio

When I looked At Psychic Reception as a whole, I found that it is basically like you using a radio signal to track Brainwaves as a Whole, Of course you can "tune in" on certain people, but the signal still decreases over distance. When I look at Psychic Reception, when not directed, it’s more like a type of Psi-Radar; its purpose might have just been originally to tell different important things about people. It's a "wireless" psychic reception, so to speak.
Empathy, however, would be more like a Lan line, It uses links between people in order to get information about them, these are not, if used effectively, affected by distance. Of course, f you aren't shielded, much like a wire or cable, It is susceptible to Psychic interference or, if your dealing with cables as a whole, crosstalk. When you shield, It Cut's out any interference from other sources than the one you are working with (just like when you put the plastic cover offer a wire) and you end up with a much longer distance in which you can get a clear "signal"
I will try to explain this better at a later time if you'd like, I've got to cut it short cause I got to get up early tomorrow (it's 11:00 pm right now), I felt I should give you something to work with here, but I don't feel that I explained it very well.
As for experience, I Study a lot about the paranormal, symbolism, and the like, I figure it this way. If the concept/math doesn't fit the experience, it's not the experience that's wrong; it's the concept/math. This is a rule that I have found. There are some things out there are out there that are biased and "un-true" , but I have found once again that there are truth in lies, and even a liar can give good information, as long as you can separate it from the falseness.
Just to give you an Idea, Here's some of what I have on my favorites. Keep in mind that this is a new computer, if it was my old one, I would have included almost three times as much.
http://www.digital-brilliance.com/necron/necron.htm
http://jcolavito.tripod.com/lostcivilizations/id25.html
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Wicca%20&%20Witchcraft/occult_signs_and_symbols.htm <-- this one’s very biased, don’t trust all info
http://www.realmagick.com/
http://www.psipog.net/home.html
http://www.the-night.net/pagan/pagansymbols.htm
http://www.psipog.net/thepsionshandbook01.pdf/
http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/sta37.htm
http://www.rsc.org/chemsoc/visualelements//pages/alchemist/alchemy.html
http://www.goldentreewands.com/symbolmagic.htm
http://www.spelwerx.com/rarebooks.html
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/24332/Rowe_-Benjamin---Enochian-Magick-Reference
http://www.yoga-age.com/modern/philosophy/phylosophy16.html
http://psychicvampirism.com/
http://psychicvampire.org/index.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_vampire
http://www.john-dee.org/
http://www.pickle-publishing.com/papers/prophecy/seven-heads.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen_angel#Fallen_angels_by_rank
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runic_alphabet
http://www.facade.com/tarot/
http://www.psipog.net/tkjournal01.html
http://www.perbang.dk/orcapia.cms?aid=30
http://www.tenthdimension.com/textonly.php
http://www.masonicinfo.com/symbols.htm
I apologize if I reapeated anything, I think I'm missing a few of these things also, but it's all very interesting info, sometimes you may be able to piece together what I was researching based off of these links.
I hope I was a help Wandering Wolf, I'll be back on tomorrow if I can ^_^.
When I looked At Psychic Reception as a whole, I found that it is basically like you using a radio signal to track Brainwaves as a Whole, Of course you can "tune in" on certain people, but the signal still decreases over distance. When I look at Psychic Reception, when not directed, it’s more like a type of Psi-Radar; its purpose might have just been originally to tell different important things about people. It's a "wireless" psychic reception, so to speak. Empathy, however, would be more like a Lan line, It uses links between people in order to get information about them, these are not, if used effectively, affected by distance. Of course, f you aren't shielded, much like a wire or cable, It is susceptible to Psychic interference or, if your dealing with cables as a whole, crosstalk. When you shield, It Cut's out any interference from other sources than the one you are working with (just like when you put the plastic cover offer a wire) and you end up with a much longer distance in which you can get a clear "signal" I will try to explain this better at a later time if you'd like, I've got to cut it short cause I got to get up early tomorrow (it's 11:00 pm right now), I felt I should give you something to work with here, but I don't feel that I explained it very well. As for experience, I Study a lot about the paranormal, symbolism, and the like, I figure it this way. If the concept/math doesn't fit the experience, it's not the experience that's wrong; it's the concept/math. This is a rule that I have found. There are some things out there are out there that are biased and "un-true" , but I have found once again that there are truth in lies, and even a liar can give good information, as long as you can separate it from the falseness. Just to give you an Idea, Here's some of what I have on my favorites. Keep in mind that this is a new computer, if it was my old one, I would have included almost three times as much. http://www.digital-brilliance.com/necron/necron.htm http://jcolavito.tripod.com/lostcivilizations/id25.html http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Wicca%20&%20Witchcraft/occult_signs_and_symbols.htm <-- this one’s very biased, don’t trust all info http://www.realmagick.com/ http://www.psipog.net/home.html http://www.the-night.net/pagan/pagansymbols.htm http://www.psipog.net/thepsionshandbook01.pdf/ http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/sta37.htm http://www.rsc.org/chemsoc/visualelements//pages/alchemist/alchemy.html http://www.goldentreewands.com/symbolmagic.htm http://www.spelwerx.com/rarebooks.html http://www.docstoc.com/docs/24332/Rowe_-Benjamin---Enochian-Magick-Reference http://www.yoga-age.com/modern/philosophy/phylosophy16.html http://psychicvampirism.com/ http://psychicvampire.org/index.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_vampire http://www.john-dee.org/ http://www.pickle-publishing.com/papers/prophecy/seven-heads.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen_angel#Fallen_angels_by_rank http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runic_alphabet http://www.facade.com/tarot/ http://www.psipog.net/tkjournal01.html http://www.perbang.dk/orcapia.cms?aid=30 http://www.tenthdimension.com/textonly.php http://www.masonicinfo.com/symbols.htm I apologize if I reapeated anything, I think I'm missing a few of these things also, but it's all very interesting info, sometimes you may be able to piece together what I was researching based off of these links. I hope I was a help Wandering Wolf, I'll be back on tomorrow if I can ^_^.

Last edited by Akio, 4 years, 7 months ago
Posted 4 years, 7 months ago

Page: 1, 2, 3 - Next

Add Reply

You are not allowed to post. Please login (or join for free).

All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2007-2009 Sean Connelly and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
Best viewed with Firefox, with minimum resolution of 1024 x 768. Microsoft can suck my balls.
A Little Weird is proudly powered by WordPress - Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).