A Little Weird » Forums » 9/11 + Controlled Explosives = Conspiracy :-O

A Little Weird

reality bizarres the standard

You are not logged in - Join for Free - Login Forum Home » Weird Discussions » 9/11 + Controlled Explosives = Conspiracy :-O
9/11 + Controlled Explosives = Conspiracy :-O

Author | Message
--- | ---

deusxmachina

I was wondering what you thinking was on a few discrepancies in the happenings on that day. I'm not one to jump to blame the government, but at the same time, something definitely is fishy about the situation.
1) The way building 7 went down: Ok, towers 1 and 2 may or may not have fallen due to thermal stress, but it's within the realm of possibility. However, if you take a look at building 7, the one no one talks about really, it falls STRAIGHT down. That would mean in order for the roof to come down level, all or most vertical supports would have to fail at the same time.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM
Huh, actually just found this one, http://youtube.com/watch?v=IX9gdRST6zM&feature=related which if you know anything about controlled demolition, you know that there is only one thing that little poof 40 stories below the implosion could have been: a squib, or charge used to weaken beams.
2) Utter lack of smoke, bodies, and wreckage in the United 93 crash site: Everyone has the image of giant black smoke clouds billowing up from the twin towers. This was caused by an oxygen-deprived burning of long-chain hydrocarbons in jet fuel. Also, why was there SOO little wreckage, and why was it scattered across several miles?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=BeWi0JpI__M
3) The pentagon: This is supposed to be the most secure facility in the world, or one of. There are cameras ALL over the damn place. Not only that, but there are several hotels, parking garages, etc with cameras that would have caught the flight path of the plane. However, there is only one shred of video evidence, which just shows a white blur, and then a fireball, you can't really discern what it was. Why don't they just release one of the videos that shows the flight of the jet, just to shut everyone up?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0Om9_Lbco6A&feature=related
And here's just a bit I thought about. The US has NORAD, a massive radar establishment dedicated to locating, targeting, tracking, and aiding in the elimination of airborne threats. It was designed to track Soviet bombers and ICBMs and direct fighter strikes against them. If our US military couldn't handle four rogue jet airliners loafing around for a half hour or so, what the hell would have happened with supersonic nuclear bombers?
I was wondering what you thinking was on a few discrepancies in the happenings on that day. I'm not one to jump to blame the government, but at the same time, something definitely is fishy about the situation. 1) The way building 7 went down: Ok, towers 1 and 2 may or may not have fallen due to thermal stress, but it's within the realm of possibility. However, if you take a look at building 7, the one no one talks about really, it falls STRAIGHT down. That would mean in order for the roof to come down level, all or most vertical supports would have to fail at the same time. http://youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM Huh, actually just found this one, http://youtube.com/watch?v=IX9gdRST6zM&feature=related which if you know anything about controlled demolition, you know that there is only one thing that little poof 40 stories below the implosion could have been: a squib, or charge used to weaken beams. 2) Utter lack of smoke, bodies, and wreckage in the United 93 crash site: Everyone has the image of giant black smoke clouds billowing up from the twin towers. This was caused by an oxygen-deprived burning of long-chain hydrocarbons in jet fuel. Also, why was there SOO little wreckage, and why was it scattered across several miles? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BeWi0JpI__M 3) The pentagon: This is supposed to be the most secure facility in the world, or one of. There are cameras ALL over the damn place. Not only that, but there are several hotels, parking garages, etc with cameras that would have caught the flight path of the plane. However, there is only one shred of video evidence, which just shows a white blur, and then a fireball, you can't really discern what it was. Why don't they just release one of the videos that shows the flight of the jet, just to shut everyone up? http://youtube.com/watch?v=0Om9_Lbco6A&feature=related And here's just a bit I thought about. The US has NORAD, a massive radar establishment dedicated to locating, targeting, tracking, and aiding in the elimination of airborne threats. It was designed to track Soviet bombers and ICBMs and direct fighter strikes against them. If our US military couldn't handle four rogue jet airliners loafing around for a half hour or so, what the hell would have happened with supersonic nuclear bombers?

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

Antisankari

Surely they knew about the Rogue planes.
No doubts there.
BUT what the hell is there to gain?
Had they shot them down, the people would have blamed and the government. Had any international passengers perished, it would have been a scandal. However, by letting the Planes reach their destination, USA took a high profile hit with little strategic importance.
By allowing this they got:
- Whole worlds sympathy.
- Casus belli to pretty much any terrorist state.
- A chance to warm relationships with other great powers. Including Russia.
Had they simply struck the Civilian planes down they would have:
- Whole worlds critique and blame.
- Not a clear reason to blame anyone. Hijacking is not exactly same as a mass murder.
- Chanse to infuriate several nations with their citizens being killed in process.
So, the government possibly played their cards in 100% right way.
People are born every day, they will not end and are usually disposable. However, international opportunity such as this is unlikely to happen again soon.
Surely they knew about the Rogue planes. No doubts there. BUT what the hell is there to gain? Had they shot them down, the people would have blamed and the government. Had any international passengers perished, it would have been a scandal. However, by letting the Planes reach their destination, USA took a high profile hit with little strategic importance. By allowing this they got: - Whole worlds sympathy. - Casus belli to pretty much any terrorist state. - A chance to warm relationships with other great powers. Including Russia. Had they simply struck the Civilian planes down they would have: - Whole worlds critique and blame. - Not a clear reason to blame anyone. Hijacking is not exactly same as a mass murder. - Chanse to infuriate several nations with their citizens being killed in process. So, the government possibly played their cards in 100% right way. People are born every day, they will not end and are usually disposable. However, international opportunity such as this is unlikely to happen again soon.

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

Vimick

this has been beaten to death over the years people cant let it go. the past is past.
this has been beaten to death over the years people cant let it go. the past is past.

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

NewAgeAlchemist

Eventually the Fed has to release the videos, black box recordings and other such info. If you want to know what happened lend your support/money to civil liberty groups trying to get them released, but arguing over a message board probably isn't going to have any effect on the discussion.
Eventually the Fed has to release the videos, black box recordings and other such info. If you want to know what happened lend your support/money to civil liberty groups trying to get them released, but arguing over a message board probably isn't going to have any effect on the discussion.

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

SheepKing

I've got a REAL conspiracy for you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saHs6J0OXVI
I've got a REAL conspiracy for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saHs6J0OXVI

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

deusxmachina

Oh, I don't care about anything getting done about it, the government doesn't give a shit about people's opinions.
I'm just curious as to others take on this.
@SheepKing: LMAO that made my day.
To me, a good coverup story is entertainment, just like a good murder mystery.
Oh, I don't care about anything getting done about it, the government doesn't give a shit about people's opinions. I'm just curious as to others take on this. @SheepKing: LMAO that made my day. To me, a good coverup story is entertainment, just like a good murder mystery.

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

Add Reply

You are not allowed to post. Please login (or join for free).

All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2007-2009 Sean Connelly and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
Best viewed with Firefox, with minimum resolution of 1024 x 768. Microsoft can suck my balls.
A Little Weird is proudly powered by WordPress - Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).