A Little Weird » Forums » Psionics effecting digicams?

A Little Weird

reality bizarres the standard

You are not logged in - Join for Free - Login Forum Home » Weird Discussions » Psionics effecting digicams?
Psionics effecting digicams?

Author | Message
--- | ---

bd333

I guess "Psionics and Digicams" would be a better title for this thread, oh well...
I was trying to film a video of me making the psi-wheel spin and every time I tried, the camera gave me an encoding error (memory card error, which means the file was not written to the card correctly) when I stopped the clip. It is an old camera, a canon powershot a400, but it worked every other time I tried filming something else. I have heard of people effecting electronics with psi, maybe my mind wanted the video to turn out, so the opposite happened.
This intrigued me, how much could psionics effect digital cameras? Can people make constructs that perhaps an infrared or another special camera could capture but the human eye cannot see?
Can people actually capture a legitimate decent quality photo where you can see psi energy (such as a flared construct) or are they all photoshopped?
I guess "Psionics and Digicams" would be a better title for this thread, oh well... I was trying to film a video of me making the psi-wheel spin and every time I tried, the camera gave me an encoding error (memory card error, which means the file was not written to the card correctly) when I stopped the clip. It is an old camera, a canon powershot a400, but it worked every other time I tried filming something else. I have heard of people effecting electronics with psi, maybe my mind wanted the video to turn out, so the opposite happened. This intrigued me, how much could psionics effect digital cameras? Can people make constructs that perhaps an infrared or another special camera could capture but the human eye cannot see? Can people actually capture a legitimate decent quality photo where you can see psi energy (such as a flared construct) or are they all photoshopped?

Last edited by bd333, 4 years, 8 months ago
Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

SheepKing

I've seen a picture that was supposedly of a psiball. I do not remember what kind of camera took it; But it was supposedly some high-tech imager at a university somewhere. I don't have the picture on this computer; I'll see if I can find it on my old computer.
I've seen a picture that was supposedly of a psiball. I do not remember what kind of camera took it; But it was supposedly some high-tech imager at a university somewhere. I don't have the picture on this computer; I'll see if I can find it on my old computer.

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

delimew

i don't know any of the details, but psipog had some images that are meant to be psiballs.
which, when enhanced, comes out as
also,
which becomes
i don't know any of the details, but psipog had some images that are meant to be psiballs. [img]http://psipog.net/m_evan-original-3.jpg[/img] which, when enhanced, comes out as [img]http://psipog.net/m_evan-enhanced-3.jpg[/img] also, [img]http://psipog.net/m_evan-original-2.jpg[/img] which becomes [img]http://psipog.net/m_evan-enhanced-2.jpg[/img]

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

SheepKing

Hey good point I forgot about those!
Hey good point I forgot about those!

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

Antisankari

@bd33,
You might for example start eliminating factors that could contribute to the error.
First. Take off the memorycard and let the thing store images in its internal memory.
If the camera gives another lame excuse for not storing data, there might be something interesting phenomenon at work.
@bd33, You might for example start eliminating factors that could contribute to the error. First. Take off the memorycard and let the thing store images in its internal memory. If the camera gives another lame excuse for not storing data, there might be something interesting phenomenon at work.

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

ErikJDurwoodII

CCD-based cameras exhibit the broadest range of light sensitivity. CCD's are generally sensitive to about 350nm wavelength UV light down to the IR-A group of about 1400nm.
Most video and still CCD cameras have sheets of UV filters on the sensor's surface to protect it from the high density light as well as preserve the visible luminosity of the subject matter. A bit of clever hacking can remove these filters and produce a camera that is much more sensitive the the "non-visibles" around you.
In my experience, I have captured more in the "higher-than-visible" spectrum than I have in the lower ones. This coincides with the evidence that suggests that detectable psionic effects are in the upper regions of the EM spectrum and beyond; and it is through "collapsing down" to the lower ranges that we can observe the interaction.
see Geiger Counter experiment.
- Erik
CCD-based cameras exhibit the broadest range of light sensitivity. CCD's are generally sensitive to about 350nm wavelength UV light down to the IR-A group of about 1400nm. Most video and still CCD cameras have sheets of UV filters on the sensor's surface to protect it from the high density light as well as preserve the visible luminosity of the subject matter. A bit of clever hacking can remove these filters and produce a camera that is much more sensitive the the "non-visibles" around you. In my experience, I have captured more in the "higher-than-visible" spectrum than I have in the lower ones. This coincides with the evidence that suggests that detectable psionic effects are in the upper regions of the EM spectrum and beyond; and it is through "collapsing down" to the lower ranges that we can observe the interaction. see Geiger Counter experiment. - Erik

Last edited by ErikJDurwoodII, 4 years, 8 months ago
Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

bd333

I forgot about the images from psipog... I was just wondering if there is any high resolution photos, maybe long exposures, that have captured psi energy. What eric said makes sense why they are less likely to capture the image so I wouldn't be very supprised if there wern't many legit ones.
@Antisankari, As I said it is an older camera so it doesn't have built in memory. I will try to experiment with another memory card that I have lying around...
My newer camera works fine for filming psionics but it is newer technology so I can't really compare results from it. On the old camera, I had gotten the same error once or twice before but they were not in such a concintrated time period (it happened once that time then worked fine, this time it happened four or five times in a row).
I forgot about the images from psipog... I was just wondering if there is any high resolution photos, maybe long exposures, that have captured psi energy. What eric said makes sense why they are less likely to capture the image so I wouldn't be very supprised if there wern't many legit ones. @Antisankari, As I said it is an older camera so it doesn't have built in memory. I will try to experiment with another memory card that I have lying around... My newer camera works fine for filming psionics but it is newer technology so I can't really compare results from it. On the old camera, I had gotten the same error once or twice before but they were not in such a concintrated time period (it happened once that time then worked fine, this time it happened four or five times in a row).

Last edited by bd333, 4 years, 8 months ago
Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

ErikJDurwoodII

Oh, I didn't say that they couldn't, but that it was just less common without the right tools. I have seen a couple long-exposure photos suggesting the presence of flaring with simple, basic, unmodified point-and-shoot cameras.
Interesting stuff.
Oh, I didn't say that they couldn't, but that it was just less common without the right tools. I have seen a couple long-exposure photos suggesting the presence of flaring with simple, basic, unmodified point-and-shoot cameras. Interesting stuff.

Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

bd333

Whoops, I see what you mean, I must have just read it too fast :)
Whoops, I see what you mean, I must have just read it too fast :)

Last edited by bd333, 4 years, 8 months ago
Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

bd333

After doing some testing I got some interesting results...
1. With my old camera, at about 30 seconds the clips stops working, about 5-10 seconds after I get the psi wheel to start spinning.
2. Of four trials, the time it didn't work was the only time that I really had any effect on the psi-wheel, the other times I wasn't really concentrating hard enough.
3. Of my later trials, three out of five times the camera didn't work (I got the wheel to move every time this time)
4. When filming with my new camera, the focus starts to mess up once I get the psi wheel to move (unless its manually focused, then its locked in place)
My control was wandering around my house afterwards taking two minute clips with absolutely no problems.
After doing some testing I got some interesting results... 1. With my old camera, at about 30 seconds the clips stops working, about 5-10 seconds after I get the psi wheel to start spinning. 2. Of four trials, the time it didn't work was the only time that I really had any effect on the psi-wheel, the other times I wasn't really concentrating hard enough. 3. Of my later trials, three out of five times the camera didn't work (I got the wheel to move every time this time) 4. When filming with my new camera, the focus starts to mess up once I get the psi wheel to move (unless its manually focused, then its locked in place) My control was wandering around my house afterwards taking two minute clips with absolutely no problems.

Last edited by DarkTiger, 3 years, 11 months ago
Posted 4 years, 8 months ago

Add Reply

You are not allowed to post. Please login (or join for free).

All Content, Images, Video, Text, and Software is © Copyright 2007-2009 Sean Connelly and their respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
Best viewed with Firefox, with minimum resolution of 1024 x 768. Microsoft can suck my balls.
A Little Weird is proudly powered by WordPress - Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).