Comments on: Emergence, pt. 2

http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/ reality bizarres the standard Sat, 18 Aug 2012 16:46:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: Meaux http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1612 Meaux Mon, 04 May 2009 20:59:31 +0000 http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1612 Very interesting, Sean. +1 for Atheism. This shows that a simple system can lead to complicated, inpredictable outcome. Colliding atoms lead to complicated molecules, lead to a single celled organism, and the rest we know of.. =) By: Raathuus http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1581 Raathuus Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:00:55 +0000 http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1581 If I'm right, this is made in JavaScript. By: Antisankari http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1580 Antisankari Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:21:53 +0000 http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1580 Blue has won on 2 tries out ouf 2. Must be majic! :D By: DigGil http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1578 DigGil Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:06:00 +0000 http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1578 That problem again no! Can't stand the headache *dies out*. What would a robot see? But then when we see what the robot saw it's like not having the robot... The question that leads from Schroninger's cat is very annoying. By: Antisankari http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1571 Antisankari Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:05:36 +0000 http://alittleweird.com/2009/04/18/emergence-pt-2/#comment-1571 Ouch. You just "contaminated" a perfectly good test setting :P Now that you described "emergence" as an eventual result from running simulation, what keeps users from unconsciously "willing" such phenomenon to occur? We are dealing with several random throws here after all. Does emergence exist because it does, or does our expectancy cause it?